Forgetting in a Networked Age

tl;dr: Research and report on a topic directly related to the themes of the module: Forgetting and the Sins of Memory (see Daniel Schacter), Bias and Subverting Memory, the internet and permanence of digital 'memories', the Right to be Forgotten, technology Mediated forgetting, ephemerality in media and digital content, etc. Document and report your findings to the class and reflect on their implication for what and how we'll make.

Learning Objectives

As part of the exercise, students will:

• build familiarity with the challenges of forgetting in a networked age;
• explore aspects of networked digital information and the challenges it poses for us a forgetful humans;
• identify and review concepts that relate to the course and that can inform our work;
• helped co-create a body of knowledge on memory to draw on as part of their own explorations;
• reflect on how technology and forgetting do and might overlap and the issues we should consider in designign new tools to support forgetting.

Brief:

As part of this thinking piece, you’re asked to critically examine a topic relating to forgetting and/or designing tangible tools to support forgetting (digital) content. It should be a topic that you’re personally interested in, that’s relevant to this course, and report it to the group.

Topics, are of your choosing and might include:

• Aspects of forgetting for example an exploration of one of Daniel Schacter’s ‘sins of memory’
• The history of forgetting and how it has changed in a networked age;
• Case studies or issues presented by the Internet, social media or other networked forms of knowledge;
• Rituals and practices for letting go of the past;
• Concepts relating to emphermerality or self-destructing content;
• Research and practice in curating or deleting digital legacy;
• Technologies to support ‘letting go’, deleting the past or mediate forgetting e.g. the Right to be Forgotten
• The ethics of forgetting online
• Etc.

They should be ideas that you haven’t encountered before, are relevant to the course and you find particularly interesting or exciting. The emphasis here is on discovery and critical reflection. Writing about concept you already know intimately defeats the point of the assignment, which is to deepen your familiarity with the field.

Deliverables:

Add your Thinking Piece to the #thinkingpieces as a new post on slack (see below).

This post should contain a essay (750 words) on a topic of your choosing. This should a) introduce the topic you have chosen, b) raise questions and provocations, and C) provide a critical reflection or perspective on the topic.

The thinking piece should include appropriate citations, link referenced texts and works and acknowledge authors appropriately. You’re welcome to include illustrations and images as needed too.

Guidance

As part of thinking pieces, students will identify an open question or challenge posed in developing responsive technologies within the scope of the themes or projects assigned and that they are personally interested in. This should include a clear description of your area of interest as well as supporting research, examples, precedents, and other sources that provide context to your ideas and argumentation.

Reflect on the ideas you’ve encountered as part of the course and select one you’d like to explore more. You’re welcome to go beyond the three investigations to other ideas you’ve encountered too.

In your statement do three things:

1. Start from a problem, open challenge or area of interest i.e. give a little explanation what you chose the area/idea/question you did and why its interesting and relevant;
2. Formalize a question or statement which expresses that interest effectively and narrowly i.e. distill it down to something quick, easy and clear to communicate
3. Develop a statement of how it relates to ideas and outcomes which precede it i.e. support it with references and research; tell us why this is important; how does it advance or extend prior work; etc.

For part 3, don’t rely only on things introduced or surfaced as part of the course materials or discussions. You’re expect to go beyond the course materials and readings and bring in new literature, projects, exemplars, and ideas.

Submitting your work:

You’ll submit your work on Slack. As a new post:

• Open Slack and navigate to the #thinkingpieces channel
• In the text box (bottom), click the + on the left hand side. Choose the option to ‘Create a new post’
• In the post editor, give the case study and appropriate title.
• Add your narrative to the body of the post.
• When you have added your post, click the Share button on the top right.

Important: the hashtag will be used to automatically check you have made the required posts for each module. If you forget to include it you won’t get a grade for the post.

You should:

• Read and review articles, papers, and other sources i.e. do good research!
• Inquire into new areas.
• Be rigorous and systematic; and
• document your findings as you go.

Then, share your discoveries with the group by reporting your findings in a 1-page summary incl. sources.

A starting point: This article on brainpickings is a good starting point to prime you on the basics of how memory works and the Guardian maintains a section of interesting and though-provoking articles on neuroscience, psychology and memory that might help point you in interesting directions.

Reflection on your findings

Reflect on the outcomes of your research.

• What are interesting theories, technologies or territories for us to explore?
• What are the challenges or opportunities that lie in the concepts and examples you’ve surfaced?

Come up with a series of questions and problem statements related to the idea of creating prosthetic technologies for human memory, capturing and representing experiences digitially, or networking, connecting or distributing memories.

Resources and Sources

See the Resources for this module and Library Section of course Website.